The Rawlsian Principle and Secession-Proofness in Large Heterogeneous Societies
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper examines a model of multi-jurisdictional formation considered by Alesina and Spolaore (1997) and Le Breton and Weber (2003), where the distribution of individuals is given by Lebesgue measure over the (finite or infinite) interval. Every jurisdiction chooses a location of a public good and shares the cost of production among its residents. Each individual covers transportation cost to the location of the public good, and contributes towards the production of the public good. We consider a notion of a secession-proof allocation where no group of individuals can make all its members better off by choosing both a location of the public good and a cost-sharing mechanism among its own members. We show that if the society’s population is distributed over the real line <, the only secession-proof allocation is Rawlsian, which equalizes the utilities of all individuals in the society. In the case of bounded support, we show that there is a degree of approximation to the Rawlsian solution that reconciles the secession-proofness and the weakened Rawlsian principle.
منابع مشابه
Rawlsian pricing of access to public facilities: A unidimensional illustration
We consider a setting where citizens using a public facility (e.g., a hospital, a library or a post-office) face an idiosyncratic private access cost (e.g. transportation) and, in addition, must contribute to the costs of facility. We show that if the population is uniformly spread over the entire real line, if the cost of a facility is independent of location and access costs are linear with r...
متن کاملEquilibrium spatial pricing in a multi-dimensional setting
Consider a population of citizens uniformly spread over the entire plane, that faces a problem of locating public facilities to be used by its members. The cost of every facility is financed by its usersonly, who in addition face an idiosyncratic private access cost to the facility. We assume that the facilities’ cost is independent of location and access costs are linear with respect to the Eu...
متن کامل"Almost" subsidy-free spatial pricing in a multi-dimensional setting
Consider a population of citizens uniformly spread over the entire plane, that faces a problem of locating public facilities to be used by its members. The cost of every facility is financed by its users, who also face an idiosyncratic private access cost to the facility. We assume that the facilities’ cost is independent of location and access costs are linear with respect to the Euclidean dis...
متن کاملImplementation by vote-buying mechanisms∗
A vote-buying mechanism is such that each agent chooses a quantity of votes x to cast for an alternative at a cost c(x), and the outcome is determined by the total number of votes cast for each alternative. In the context of binary decisions, we prove that the welfare optima that can be implemented by vote-buying mechanisms in large societies are parameterized by a positive parameter ρ, which m...
متن کاملLiberal Egalitarianism and the Harm Principle
This paper analyses Rawlss celebrated di¤erence principle, and its lexicographic extension, in societies with a nite and an in nite number of agents. A uni ed framework of analysis is set up, which allows one to characterise Rawlsian egalitarian principles by means of a weaker version of a new axiom the Harm Principle recently proposed by [13]. This is quite surprising, because the Harm princ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004